🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial law change that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.