🔗 Share this article

One of the most recognizable images of the twentieth century portrays a nude young girl, her limbs spread wide, her features twisted in terror, her flesh burned and raw. She can be seen fleeing toward the lens as fleeing a bombing in South Vietnam. To her side, additional kids are racing out of the bombed hamlet in Trảng Bàng, with a scene of dark smoke along with soldiers.

This International Effect from an Powerful Image

Just after the publication during the Vietnam War, this photograph—formally called "The Terror of War"—turned into an analog sensation. Viewed and analyzed by millions, it has been widely attributed with energizing worldwide views critical of the US war in Vietnam. One noted author later observed how the profoundly unforgettable photograph featuring the young Kim Phúc suffering likely did more to fuel popular disgust against the war compared to extensive footage of televised barbarities. A renowned English documentarian who reported on the fighting called it the single best photograph from what would later be called the media war. Another experienced war journalist remarked that the photograph stands as quite simply, a pivotal photos ever made, particularly from that conflict.

The Long-Standing Claim and a Recent Claim

For over five decades, the photograph was assigned to Nick Út, a then-21-year-old local photojournalist on assignment for the Associated Press at the time. Yet a controversial latest film released by a popular platform claims that the well-known picture—long considered to be the peak of war journalism—might have been shot by a different man on the scene in Trảng Bàng.

According to the investigation, "Napalm Girl" may have been photographed by a stringer, who provided his work to the AP. The allegation, along with the documentary's following research, stems from a former editor a former photo editor, who alleges that a dominant photo chief ordered him to alter the photo's byline from the original photographer to Nick Út, the sole agency photographer there at the time.

This Investigation for the Truth

The former editor, currently elderly, contacted an investigator in 2022, seeking support to locate the uncredited photographer. He stated how, should he still be alive, he hoped to offer an acknowledgment. The investigator thought of the unsupported photographers he knew—seeing them as modern freelancers, just as Vietnamese freelancers during the war, are routinely marginalized. Their efforts is commonly doubted, and they work in far tougher situations. They are not insured, no long-term security, minimal assistance, they usually are without good equipment, and they remain highly exposed while photographing within their homeland.

The journalist pondered: How would it feel for the person who took this iconic picture, if in fact it wasn't Nick Út?” As a photographer, he thought, it could be deeply distressing. As a student of the craft, especially the celebrated documentation of the era, it would be groundbreaking, maybe legacy-altering. The hallowed history of the photograph within Vietnamese-Americans meant that the creator who had family fled during the war was reluctant to take on the film. He said, “I didn’t want to disrupt the accepted account that Nick had taken the picture. And I didn’t want to disturb the current understanding within a population that had long respected this success.”

This Search Develops

Yet both the journalist and his collaborator agreed: it was worth raising the issue. “If journalists are going to hold everybody else responsible,” remarked the investigator, “we have to be able to ask difficult questions within our profession.”

The investigation documents the team in their pursuit of their own investigation, including discussions with witnesses, to public appeals in modern Saigon, to archival research from related materials taken that day. Their search lead to a name: a freelancer, employed by a television outlet at the time who also worked as a stringer to foreign agencies independently. In the film, an emotional Nghệ, currently elderly and living in the United States, claims that he provided the image to the agency for a small fee and a copy, yet remained plagued by the lack of credit for years.

This Reaction and Ongoing Investigation

Nghệ appears in the film, reserved and thoughtful, but his story turned out to be explosive within the field of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to